A study on the optimization of English writing teaching system in medical colleges and universities based on the perspective of curriculum ideology and politics
Keywords:ideological and political education in the curriculum, medical colleges, English writing, teaching system, action research
By adopting a theoretical framework based on constructivism and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), this study uses case study and action research methods to explore how to enhance medical students’ language skills, humanistic literacy, and research awareness under the perspective of curriculum ideology and politics. Observations and in-depth interviews revealed teachers’ and students’ views on English writing teaching, while action research explored and tested strategies for teaching reform. The results indicated that integrating the cultivation of language skills, humanistic literacy, and research awareness into the actual teaching process, along with providing ample practical opportunities and specific guidance, are key to improving medical students’ abilities. Continuous evaluation and adjustment are required in teaching reform to ensure its effectiveness and adaptability. This study provides empirical evidence for understanding how to optimize teaching activities under the perspective of ideological and political education in the curriculum to enhance the language skills, humanistic literacy, and research awareness of medical students, and provides guidance for future teaching reforms.
Feng, J., & Bai, Y. (2021). On the integration of ideological and political education into college English teaching. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 4(3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2021.040301
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.20343/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385679
Khan, H., Taqui, A. M., Khawaja, M. R., & Fatmi, Z. (2007). Problem-based versus conventional curricula: influence on knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards health research. PloS one, 2(7), e632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000632
Li, J., & Wang, L. (2021). The construction and reflection of the politics course system in higher education institutions under the background of ideological and political education. Higher Education Studies, 11(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n1p53
Llinares, A., & Dafouz, E. (2020). Content and language integration in higher education: instructional practices and teacher development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(1), 1-5.
MacLeod, R. D., Parkin, C., Pullon, S., & Robertson, G. (2003). Early clinical exposure to people who are dying: learning to care at the end of life. Medical Education, 37(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01412.x
Morton, T. (2013). Critical approaches to CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). European research on content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication, 25, 3-13.
Ousager, J., & Johannessen, H. (2016). Humanities in undergraduate medical education: a literature review. Academic Medicine, 91(6), 988-1002. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dd226b
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000
Perez-Canado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Prince, K.J., Boshuizen, H.P., van der Vleuten, C.P., & Scherpbier, A.J. (2005). Students’ opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Medical Education, 39(7), 704-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02207.x
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Schmidt, H.G., Rotgans, J.I., & Yew, E.H. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
Shapiro, J., Morrison, E., & Boker, J. (2004). Teaching empathy to first year medical students: evaluation of an elective literature and medicine course. Education for Health, 17(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280310001656196
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2017). Opinions on deepening the reform of undergraduate education and teaching and improving the quality of talent training (Jiao Gao  No. 4). http://www.moe.gov.cn/
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Guiding opinions on promoting ideological and political education in university courses (Jiao Gao  No. 1). http://www.moe.gov.cn/
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020). Notice on strengthening and improving the construction of ideological and political theory courses in universities in the new era (Jiao Gao  No. 2). http://www.moe.gov.cn/
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Language Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.