Linguistic pragmatism, lingua francae, and language death in Indonesia

Yvonne Sewell

doi:10.54475/jlt.2022.015

Authors

Yvonne Sewell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2022.015

Keywords:

linguicide, language death, lingua franca, indigenous languages, Indonesia, Bahasa Malaysia, linguistic instrumentalism, linguistic pragmatism, colonialism, reginal indigenous heritage languages

Abstract

Indonesia holds incredible linguistic diversity with up to 750 distinct languages. According to the Indonesian Language Association (ILA), 728 native languages are spoken in Indonesia, whereas Kompas cites 720, Ethnologue (2005) lists 743, and LIPI reports 749. In 2016, UNESCO indicated that 139 native Indonesian languages were threatened with extinction, which makes up for almost 17% of their languages. In Indonesia, due to ideals of nationalism and to an extent, modernisation, Bahasa Indonesia poses the biggest threat to indigenous languages. After defining some key terms and giving an overview of Indonesia’s language policy, three Indonesian linguistic landscapes will be described through a lens of linguistic imperialism, followed by recommendations for the preservation and revitalisation of regional indigenous heritage languages (RIHLs).

References

Ariyani, F., Putrawan, G. E., Riyanda, A. R., Idris, A. R., Misliani, L., & Perdana, R. (2022). Technology and minority language: An Android-based dictionary development for the Lampung language maintenance in Indonesia. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1), 2015088. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.2015088

Blust, R. (2009). The Austronesian languages (Pacific linguistics; 602). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.

Cooper, R. (1989). Language planning and social change (Cambridge core). Cambridge.

Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S. (2017). Language, Culture and the Periphery. In Popular Culture, Voice and Linguistic Diversity (Language and Globalization, pp. 1-26). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Ethnologue. (2022). Indonesia. Retrieved April 22, 2022, from https://www.ethnologue.com/country/ID

Florey, M. (2009). Endangered Languages of Austronesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Florey, M., & Himmelmann, N. P. (2009). New Directions in Field Linguistics: Training Strategies for Language Documentation in Indonesia. In Endangered Languages of Austronesia (pp. Endangered Languages of Austronesia, 2009-11-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Groff, C. (2016). Language and language-in-education planning in multilingual India: A minoritized language perspective. Language Policy, 16(2), 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9397-4

Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36(353), 161-196. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161

Himmelmann, N. (2008). Chapter 1 Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In J. Gippert, N. Himmelmann & U. Mosel (Ed.), Essentials of Language Documentation (pp. 1-30). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197730.1

Himmelmann, N. P. (2009). Language Endangerment Scenarios: A Case Study from Northern Central Sulawesi. In Endangered Languages of Austronesia (pp. Endangered Languages of Austronesia, 2009-11-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Judd, D. R. (1997). The role of governmental policies in promoting residential segregation in the St. Louis metropolitan area. The Journal of Negro Education, 66(3), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967162

Kaplan. R.B. (2013). Language planning. Applied Research on English Language, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2013.15459

Kompass. (2022, April 22). Kompas. Retrieved April 22, 2022, from https://www.kompas.id/kategori/humaniora/

Mackey, W. F. & Laval Univ., Quebec (Quebec). International Center for Research on Bilingualism. (1973). Three Concepts for Geolinguistics. Publication B-42. [Washington, D.C.]: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED187099

Maggalatung, Muhammad, Ridwan, M., Syarifudin, S., Darma, D., & Sulaeman, S. (2021). Reviewing Sepa Language Extinction of the Indigenous Peoples of Amahai, Moluccas, Indonesia. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 22, 778-789.

Meighan, P. J. (2021). Decolonizing the digital landscape: The role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(3), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211037672

Mignolo, W. (2017). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking (University Press Scholarship Online). Princeton.

Mufwene, S. (2007). Issues in the Study of Pidgin and Creole Languages. NWIG: New West Indian Guide / Nieuwe West-Indische Gids, 81(3/4), 338-341.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued (Taylor & Francis eBooks). New York, N.Y.: Routledge.

Rahmi, R. (2016). The Development of Language Policy in Indonesia. Englisia, 3(1), 9-22.

Suwarno, B. (2020). Acquisition Planning for Regional Indigenous Heritage Languages in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020948843

Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy (Key topics in sociolinguistics). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sneddon, J. N. (2003). The Indonesian language: Its history and role in modern society. Sydney, NSW: UNSW Press.

UNESCO Atlas of the World’s Languages in danger. (2022). UNESCO. Retrieved April 22, 2022, from http://www.unesco.org/languages-atlas/