Unpacking perezhivanie: Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for ELT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2026.009Keywords:
perezhivanie, Vygotsky, teacher identity, learner identity, sociocultural theoryAbstract
This study examines Vygotsky’s concept of perezhivanie in English Language Teaching (ELT), focusing on teacher education, professional identity, and learners’ experiences. Perezhivanie—a complex concept that connects emotion, cognition, and environment and explains how teachers and learners create meaning from their experiences—has gained growing scholarly attention. Using sociocultural theory, this study reviews various empirical studies that demonstrate how perezhivanie influences the development of teacher identity and professional growth. Findings from narrative inquiries and longitudinal case studies suggest that teachers’ experiences shape their professional perceptions, their ability to navigate challenges, and the evolution of their sense of self over time. Similarly, research on learners reveals how intense classroom events and emotional reactions interact with cognitive strategies, leading to changes in learner identity and language use. The study also addresses broader issues in education, including social justice and emotional labor, illustrating how teachers navigate tensions between institutional requirements and personal convictions and adapt their professional practices in relation to perezhivanie. Additionally, studies conducted in practicum settings and intercultural environments show that both pre-service and in-service teachers continually reinterpret past experiences to address new challenges, highlighting the role of perezhivanie in fostering reflective practice. Overall, the study argues that the interaction among emotion, cognition, and social context supports teacher development and contributes to more meaningful learning experiences. Ultimately, perezhivanie is positioned as a key theoretical and practical concept that enriches discussions of identity in ELT.
References
Heydari, J., Moradi Mokhles, H., & Abolghasemi, E. (2019). Practical thinking development by designing educational activities based on Vygotsky’s dialectical theory. Quarterly of Educational Psychology, 15(51), 51–70. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2019.35408.2384
Amory, M. D., & Johnson, K. E. (2023). Provoking novice teacher development: Cognition-and-emotion in learning-to-teach. System, 117, Article 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103112
Ay, F. A., Karakaya, A., & Yılmaz, K. (2015). Relations between self-leadership and critical thinking skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.147
Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y. (2024). Turkish students’ language learning perezhivanie, learner identities, and transformation of self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 1032–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12552
Benesch, S. (2017). Emotions and English language teaching: Exploring teachers’ emotion labor. Routledge.
Chandra, J. S. (2008). A Vygotskian perspective on promoting critical thinking in young children through mother-child interactions [Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University].
Cong-Lem, N. (2025). The relation between environment and psychological development: Unpacking Vygotsky’s influential concept of perezhivanie. Human Arenas, 8(1), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00314-6
Cong-Lem, N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2024). Perezhivanie-agency dialectic: Examining Vietnamese EFL educators’ experiences and negotiation of dramatic classroom events. System, 123, Article 103347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103347
Daniels, H. R. (2012). Dialectic and dialogic: The essence of a Vygotskian pedagogy. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 8(3), 70–79. https://psyjournals.ru/en/journals/chp/archive/2012_n3/56309
Engeström, Y. (2014). Activity theory and learning at work. In A. Schmidt & A. Reh (Eds.), Tätigkeit – Aneignung – Bildung (pp. 67–96). Springer VS.
Freire, P. (1967). Educação como prática da liberdade [Education as the practice of freedom]. Paz e Terra.
González Rey, F. (2016). Vygotsky’s concept of perezhivanie in The Psychology of Art and at the final moment of his work: Advancing his legacy. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186196
Hajhosseiny, M., & Mehran, G. (2011). Vygotsky and Freire: A comparative analysis of dialogic education. Research in Foundations of Education, 2(1), 21–38. [in Persian]
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266
Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.). (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2023). Sociocultural theory and classroom second language learning in the East Asian context: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 107(S1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12816
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Leontiev, A. N. (2005). Study of the environment in the pedological works of L. S. Vygotsky: A critical study. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 43(4), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2005.11059254
Masoudian, P., Davaei, M., Ansarian, F., & Khosravi, A. A. (2018). Designing a model of critical thinking instruction based on Vygotsky’s constructivist theory and investigating its effectiveness on elementary students. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(41), 91–109. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2018.78686
Moradi, F., Nazari, M., & Kogani, M. (2024). Intersections of social justice and emotion labor among English language teachers: A perezhivanie inquiry. System, 125, Article 103417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103417
Ng, C. (2024). Students’ perezhivaniya and engagement in English language learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 46, 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100819
Qin, L., Yao, L., & Jin, Y. (2022). Unpacking the interaction between foreign language learners’ emotion, cognition, and activity in the flipped classroom in higher education: A perezhivanie perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1005237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005237
Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. (2016). Perezhivanie in the light of the later Vygotsky’s Spinozist turn. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186197
Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & O’Connell Rust, F. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615–623. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044334
Uştuk, Ö., & Yazan, B. (2024). Pedagogizing identity through perezhivanie: A longitudinal study of identity-oriented practicum in Türkiye. Teaching and Teacher Education, 146, 104643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104643
Vasilyuk, F. (1984). The psychology of experiencing. Moscow University Press.
Veresov, N. (2017). The concept of perezhivanie in cultural-historical theory: Content and contexts. In M. Fleer, F. González Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity (pp. 47–70). Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wei, G. (2021). Imagined professional identity: A narrative inquiry into a Chinese teacher’s perezhivaniya in life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103337
Weng, Z., Troyan, F. J., Fernández, L., & McGuire, M. (2024). Examining language teacher identity and intersectionality across instructional contexts through the experience of perezhivanie. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2), 567–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3237
Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). Springer.
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002
Xu, J., & Zhang, S. (2023). The effect of the cognitive–emotional dialectic on L2 development: Enhancing our understanding of perezhivanie. The Modern Language Journal, 107(S1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12823
Zhang, Y., Lantolf, J. P., & Meng, Y. (2022). The emotion ∼ intellect dialectic in an EFL teacher’s development of a research identity: A sociocultural perspective. System, 111, Article 102954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102954
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Language Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.