Age as a factor determining effectiveness of L2 acquisition

Katarzyna Li

doi:10.54475/jlt.2023.021

Authors

Katarzyna Li University of Oxford https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5029-6972

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2023.021

Keywords:

age of onset, rate of acquisition, ultimate attainment, naturalistic L2 learning, instructed L2 learning

Abstract

A common belief is that the earlier we begin learning a language, the better chance we have at mastering it. Some push this belief further, suggesting that after one reaches a certain critical age the odds of succeeding at attaining high proficiency in L2 are dropping dramatically. However, research remains inconclusive regarding not only at what age these cut off points should be, but also whether they are indeed a fact. Nevertheless, learners, teachers and policy makers tend to repeat after Krashen et al. (1979) that “adults and older children in general initially acquire the second language faster than young children (older-is-better for rate of acquisition), but child second language acquirers will usually be superior in terms of ultimate attainment (younger-is-better in the long run)” (p, 574). This article examines historical and recent empirical evidence gathered in relation to the views that age earlier onset of L2 acquisition impacts the ultimate attainment of the learner, and explore why older learners are seen as those learning faster. It also points out at an oversight regarding the comparison between younger and older learners without considering the setting in which the language acquisition takes place. Finally, pedagogical implications of juxtaposing the empirical evidence with the views often cemented in the mentality of students, teachers and policy makers are presented.

Author Biography

Katarzyna Li, University of Oxford

Katarzyna Li (née Jasinska-Belfort) is a polyglot and a language teacher. She has been teaching English, German and French as first and foreign languages in various academic settings for over 10 years in Japan, Poland, Brazil, Hong Kong, UK and Switzerland. She graduated Computer Science at the University of Southern Denmark, obtained PGCE in Modern Foreign Languages from University of Manchester, and is currently completing her MSc in Applied Linguistics at the University of Oxford. Her research interests include neurology of L2 acquisition, child multilingualism, vocabulary acquisition, factors that affect one’s ability to attain high proficiency in L2, and statistical data analysis in context of education-related research.
Email: katarzyna.jasinskabelfort@education.ox.ac.uk

References

Abrahamsson, N., Hyltenstam, K., & Bylund, E. (2018). Age effects on language acquisition, retention and loss: Key hypotheses and findings. In K. Hyltenstam, I. Bartning, & L. Fant (Eds.), High-level language proficiency in second language and multilingual contexts (pp. 16–49). Cambridge University Press.

Baumert, J., Fleckenstein, J., Leucht, M., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2020). The long-term proficiency of early, middle, and late starters learning English as a foreign language at school: A narrative review and empirical study. Language Learning, 70(4), 1091-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12414

Bialystok, E. (2007). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb441.0

Bley-Vroman, R. (1988). The fundamental character of foreign language learning. In W. Rutherford, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 19-30). Newbury House.

Bolibaugh, C., & Foster, P. (2021). Implicit Statistical Learning in Naturalistic and Instructed Morphosyntactic Attainment: An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction Design. Language Learning, 71(4), 959–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12465

Campfield, D. E., & Murphy, V. A. (2014). Elicited imitation in search of the influence of linguistic rhythm on child L2 acquisition. System, 24, 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.002

Cenoz, J. (2002). Age differences in foreign language learning. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 135(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.135-136.06cen

Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009

Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern- day ‘Wild Child’. Academic Press.

Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 219 - 253. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab

deBot, K. (2014). The effectiveness of early foreign language in the Netherlands. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 409-418.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of Critical Period effects in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 499-533.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2018). Age in learning and teaching grammar. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0106

Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). Emotions in multiple languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x

Eubank, L., & Gregg, K. R. (1999). Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: divide et impera. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 65–99). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

European Commission. (2017). EU languages. Retrieved January 22, 2023, from https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/languages_en

Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 101–131). Routledge.

Flege, J. E., Mackay, I., & Imai, S. (2010). What accounts for “age” effects on overall degree of foreign accent. Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds, 65-82.

Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J.-H., & Gass, S. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgements measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 269 – 297. https://dori.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850

Gutchess, A. (2014). Plasticity of the aging brain: New directions in cognitive neuroscience. Science, 579-582.

Hammer, K., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2015). Acculturation as the key to the ultimate attainment? The case of Poles in the UK. In F. F. Lundell, & I. Bartning (Eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition (pp. 178–202). Multilingual Matters.

Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. Advances in Psychology, 83, 351–368.

Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 150-166.

Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational Constraints in SLA. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Merle, F., & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67(3), 631-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12242

Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., & Ritter, M. (2022). Investigating cohort effects of early foreign language learning. The Language Learning Journal, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2108124

Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000079

Johnson, J. S. (1992). Critical period effects in second language acquisition: The effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence. Language Learning, 217-248.

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0

Johnstone, R. (2009). An early start: What are the key conditions for generalized success? In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 31–41). Garnet.

Jung, J. (2020). Effects of content support on integrated reading-writing task performance and incidental vocabulary learning. System, 93, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102288

Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A., & Scarcella, R. C. (1979). Age, Rate and Eventual Attainment in Second Language Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 573-582.

Lamendella, J. T. (1977). General Principles of Neurofunctional Organization and their Manifestation in Primary and Nonprimary Language Acquisition 1. Language Learning, 155-196.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

Long, M. (2005). Problems with supposed counterevidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. International review of applied linguistics in language teaching, 287-317. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.287

Lorenz, K. Z. (1958). The evolution of behavior. Scientific American, 67–83.

Moyer, A. (2014). What’s age got to do with it? Accounting for individual factors in second language accent. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 443-464. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.3.4

Muñoz, C. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In M. d. García Mayo, & M. L. García Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1-40). Multilingual Matters Ltd. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598937-003

Nenert, R., Allendorfer, J. B., Martin, A. M., Banks, C., Vannest, J., Holland, S. K., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2017). Age-related language lateralization assessed by fMRI: The effects of sex and handedness. Brain Research, 20–35.

Oller, J., & Nagato, N. (1974). The long-term effect of FLES: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 15-19.

Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 261-283.

Patkowski, E. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 449-472.

Penfield, W. G., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. New York: Atheneum Press.

Pfenninger, S. (2017). Not so individual after all: An ecological approach to age as an individual difference variable in a classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 19-46. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.2

Pfenninger, S. E. (2017). Not so individual after all: An ecological approach to age as an individual. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 19-46.

Pfenninger, S. E. (2020). The dynamic multicausality of age of first bilingual language exposure: Evidence from a longitudinal content and language integrated learning study with dense time serial measurements. The Modern Language Journal, 104(3), 662-686. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12666

Pfenninger, S. E., & Singleton, D. (2019). Starting age overshadowed: The primacy of differential environmental and family support effects on second language attainment in an instructional context. Language Learning, 69, 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12318

Piske, T. (2017). The earlier, the better? In E. Wilden, & R. Porsch (Eds.), The professional development of primary EFL teachers: National and international research (pp. 45-57). Waxmann Verlag GmbH.

Piske, T., Flege, J. E., Mackay, I. R., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 49–71.

Qureshi, M. (2021). The effects of Age of Exposure on knowledge of English grammar in English-medium Instruction. The electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(4), 1-16.

Ruben, R. J. (1997). A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngologica, 202-205.

Singleton, D., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2022). Age. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Individual Differences (pp. 251-265). Routledge.

Singleton, D., & Ryan, L. (2004). Language Acquisition: The Age Factor (2 ed.). Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Tabatabaei, O., & Dehghani, M. (2012). Assessing the reliability of grammaticality judgment tests. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.037

Tuyet, T. T. (2020). The myth of “the earlier the better” in foreign language learning or the optimal age to learn a foreign language. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4496

van der Slik, F., Schepens, J., Bongaerts, T., & van Hout, R. (2022). Critical Period Claim Revisited: Reanalysis of Hartshorne, Tenenbaum, and Pinker (2018) Suggests Steady Decline and Learner-Type Differences. Language Learning, 87–112.

Waninge, F. (2014). Motivation, emotion and cognition: Attractor states in the classroom. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 195-213). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574

Wu, E. Y. (2022). A brief review of the effects of age on second language acquisition: Is younger better?. Journal of Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2022.001