Review on the validity of China’s Standards of English Language Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2023.014Keywords:
China’s Standards of English Language Ability, validity, language scalesAbstract
The English and Chinese versions of China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE) were released in 2018. The appearance of CSE helps to solve the problems of different standards of English exams in China, the separation of teaching and assessment objectives, and the incoherence of teaching objectives at various stages. Before, during, and after the development of the CSE, many scholars have discussed the construction of the scale from theory to practice and contributed to the realization of the same standardization for English testing in China. This paper aims to review the relevant studies in order to provide insights and suggestions for the future research and application of the CSE from three aspects: 1) introducing the two major theoretical frameworks for validating language scales in China; 2) reviewing the studies on the validity of the CSE in general; and 3) reviewing the empirical studies on the validity of the sub-scales in the CSE, including listening, speaking, reading, writing, interpreting, translation, pragmatic competence. However, there is a lack of studies on the aspect of organizational competence.
References
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Chapelle, C. A. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 254-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190135
Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language TM. Routledge.
Deng, H., Deng, J. & Zhang, W. X. (2021). Validation of the writing scales of the China’s Standards of English Language Ability. Foreign Language World (05), 66-74.
Fang, X. J. & Yang, H. Z. (2017). Validity and Validation of Language Proficiency Scales. Journal of Foreign Languages (04), 2-14.
He, L. Z. & Chen, D. J. (2017). Investigating the inner structure of China’s Standards of English: Descriptive scheme and salient features of listening ability descriptors. Foreign Language World (4), 12-19.
Kane, M. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 425-461. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306400342
Li, Q. H. & Kong, S. (2020). Research on Validity and Validation of Language Proficiency Scales: A Review. Journal of Beijing International Studies University (05), 32-45.
Liu, J. D. (2021). Validating China’s Standards of English Language Ability. Modern Foreign Languages (1): 86-100.
Liu, J. D. & Han, B. C. (2018). Theoretical considerations for developing use-oriented China’s Standards of English. Modern Foreign Languages (1): 78-90.
Luiz, D. M., Foxcroft, C. D., & Stewart, R. (2001). The construct validity of the Griffiths Scales of Mental Development. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(1), 73-83.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00158.x
Lv, X. X. & Ren, W. The validation of translation self-assessment scale from China’s Standards of English based on the Rasch Model. Foreign Language Education, (01), 57-61.
Pant, H. A., Rupp, A. A., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Köller, O. (2009). Validity issues in standard-setting studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(2-3), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.008
Papageorgiou, S., & Tannenbaum, R. J. (2016). Situating standard setting within argument-based validity. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(2), 109-123.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1149857
State Language Commission, Ministry of Education & State Language Affairs Commission. (2018). China’s Standards of English Language Ability. Higher Education Press.
Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639
Sun, L. & Fu, X. H. (2021). Research on the self-assessment validity of pragmatic competence scale based on Multi-faceted Rasch Model. Journal of Xi'an International Studies University (02), 52-57.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated edition). Cambridge University Press.
Wang, H. (2020). Research on the validity of speaking scale in China’s Standards of English: Based on the text-mining approach. Journal of Xi'an International Studies University (2), 69-74.
Xu, Y., Yang, Y. & Mu, L. (2019). Validating descriptor levels of the Interpreting Scale of the China’s Standards of English Language Ability. Foreign Language World, (4), 24-31, 66.
Zhou, Y. Q. Validating the Self-assessment Grids of China’s Standards of English Language Ability. Modern Foreign Languages (01), 101-112.
Zhou, Y. Q. Validating descriptors of the reading strategic competence subscale of CSE: Rasch measurement model perspective. Foreign Language World, (1), 79-87
Zhu, Z. C. (2016). A validation framework for the National English Proficiency Scale of China. Journal of China Examinations, (08), 3-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Language Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.